Talk:Mike Simpson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States: Idaho / Washington University Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Idaho portal This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Missouri - Washington University in St. Louis (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mormon

Although listed as Mormon, these sites call him an ex-Mormon-[1] and [www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1855704/posts]John celona 11:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I added his positions on spending/borrowing & taxes.

I added his PAC endorsement.

I removed the "Business" sentence since its dead link meant it was unverifiable, violatting Wikipedia standards.

I removed the "actively" sentence since it sounded promotional and didn't really say anything.

This is my first time editing a Wikipedia page. If you disagree with anything I did, please help me find a better way to say/do it, but don't just revert my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exmartian (talk • contribs) 07:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me or does it seem like this isn't balanced at all? Living in idaho I can't say he is without controversy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.118.128.215 (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed an article on Scientific American^[1] about an action that Mike Simpson was most heavily involved in. Could this be added to his list of concerns? 173.166.93.49 (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/politics-derail-science-on-arsenic-endangering-public-health/

Next election?

These pages, for all of these current Congress office-holders, should give the exact date and timeframe for the next "re-election" campaign, if the individual decides to try to stay in office.

When is he "up" again, exactly? Starhistory22 (talk) 03:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article/politics-derail-science-on-arsenic-endangering-public-health/

[1]